top of page

Tying the (Forbidden) Knot with #Tesla

  • Jan 2
  • 2 min read

Under several Sustainable Development Goals, transport and energy are optimised around:

  • emissions reduction

  • grid stability

  • efficiency at scale

  • behavioural alignment

  • infrastructure integration

Electric vehicles and smart energy systems are framed as solutions — not just products, but platforms for achieving systemic targets.

The optimisation focus is not innovation itself.It is coordination and control at scale.

How the System Translates This Into Decisions Actuarial, energy, and risk models increasingly shape:

  • vehicle eligibility and incentives

  • insurance pricing and coverage

  • charging access and prioritisation

  • grid participation rules

  • software-enabled compliance

These systems rely on:

  • usage data and telemetry

  • location-based risk scoring

  • emissions and efficiency thresholds

  • grid-demand forecasting

  • automated policy enforcement


Once integrated, mobility and energy are no longer neutral tools.They become conditional services.


How This Shows Up in Real Life

For drivers and households, this can feel like:

  • incentives tied to approved behaviours

  • insurance pricing linked to usage and data

  • charging access dependent on grid conditions

  • software updates altering functionality

  • mobility subtly shifting from ownership to permission


The technology feels empowering.The dependency is invisible.


The Actuarial Failure Point

When actuarial judgment defers entirely to optimisation models:

  • personal autonomy is treated as inefficiency

  • edge cases are excluded as acceptable loss

  • system resilience is prioritised over individual need

  • human override is quietly removed

Without ethical boundaries, models designed to enable transition become mechanisms of constraint.

If Ethical Actuarial Judgment Is Present

With conscious actuarial stewardship:

  • transparency around data use is mandatory

  • insurance and access remain proportional, not punitive

  • grid participation preserves opt-out pathways

  • software governance includes human consent

  • mobility remains a right, not a revocable privilege


Ethical judgment does not oppose clean technology.It prevents it from becoming a gatekeeper.


Why This Snapshot Exists


This snapshot exists to make visible how wealth can be structurally destabilised without a single law ever being passed — simply through models that forget who they are meant to serve.

The Ethical Actuary exists to keep judgment human where consequences are irreversible. For more information, visit our page dedicated to our latest creation: AESOP - the platform built for actuaries, quantitative analysis, and the many ASOP Practitioners who are the ones at the front line, approving the plans for our future: Agenda 2030. This is a networking hub for like-minded individuals who want to make a difference, and leave a legacy for generations to come.



Comments

bottom of page