top of page

Families Trapped on Survival Assistance

  • Jan 2
  • 2 min read

Why this system stabilises dependency instead of ending poverty

Under several Sustainable Development Goals, poverty is approached as a systems problem rather than a human one. The optimisation focus shifts toward:

  • cost containment

  • population stability

  • risk reduction

  • behavioural compliance

  • administrative efficiency


The system is not designed to restore independence. It is designed to manage predictability.


How the System Translates This Into Decisions


Actuarial and policy models increasingly determine:

  • eligibility thresholds

  • benefit levels and taper rates

  • compliance requirements

  • conditional access to services

  • automated review and enforcement


These systems rely on:

  • income and household modelling

  • behavioural indicators

  • dependency duration forecasts

  • risk classification

  • digital identity and verification systems


Once embedded, assistance becomes algorithmically administered, not relationally assessed.


How This Shows Up in Real Life


For families, this often feels like:

  • constant fear of losing support

  • inability to earn slightly more without penalty

  • complex reporting requirements

  • pressure to conform to predefined behaviours

  • long-term stagnation despite effort


The system provides survival. It quietly discourages escape.


The Actuarial Failure Point


When actuarial judgment is narrowed to fiscal efficiency:

  • taper cliffs punish initiative

  • human complexity is flattened into averages

  • long-term wellbeing is excluded from models

  • dependency is treated as stability


Without ethical boundaries, models designed to help the poor can trap them.


If Ethical Actuarial Judgment Is Present


With conscious actuarial stewardship:

  • benefit cliffs are modelled and removed

  • pathways to independence are prioritised

  • household resilience replaces compliance metrics

  • transitions are supported, not penalised

  • dignity is treated as a measurable outcome

Ethical judgment does not eliminate assistance. It ensures assistance does not become a cage.


Why This Snapshot Exists


This snapshot exists to make visible how wealth can be structurally destabilised without a single law ever being passed — simply through models that forget who they are meant to serve.

The Ethical Actuary exists to keep judgment human where consequences are irreversible. For more information, visit our page dedicated to our latest creation: AESOP - the platform built for actuaries, quantitative analysis, and the many ASOP Practitioners who are the ones at the front line, approving the plans for our future: Agenda 2030. This is a networking hub for like-minded individuals who want to make a difference, and leave a legacy for generations to come.



Comments

bottom of page